Cap and trade is an environmental
policy tool that delivers results with a mandatory cap on emissions while
providing sources flexibility in how they comply. Successful cap and trade
programs reward innovation, efficiency, and early action and provide strict
environmental accountability without inhibiting economic growth.
Examples of successful cap and
trade programs include the nationwide Acid Rain Program and the regional NOx
Budget Trading Program in the Northeast. Additionally, EPA issued the Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR) on March 10, 2005, to build on the success of these
programs and achieve significant additional emission reductions.
"Under my plan
of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."
-- Barack Obama, January 17, 2008, San Francisco Chronicle.
President Obama was
honest about cap and trade during the campaign. I guess nobody was listening.
The following are
some excerpts from the Testimony of James E. Hansen NASA Goddard Institute for
Space Studies to The Committee on Ways and Means United States House of
Representatives on Cap and Trade
"Tax &
Trade (a.k.a., ‘Cap & Trade’, pseudonymously and sometimes
disingenuously)
‘Cap & Trade’
increases costs to the public as does ‘Tax & Dividend’, but without the
dividend. Thus it should be termed ‘Tax & Trade’. Part of the reason for
the pseudonym is to avoid the stigma of a tax, under the presumption that the
public is too gullible to figure it out. Other parties support ‘Cap &
Trade’ because they hope to profit – it is a give-away to special interests,
who feel, based on extensive empirical evidence, that they will be able to
manipulate the program through their lobbyists. Except for its stealth approach
to taxing the public, and its attraction to special interests, ‘Cap &
Trade’ seems to have little merit."
Cap&Trade does
not have a prayer of phasing out fossil fuel emissions fast enough to save the
planet, e.g., allowing us to phase-out coal-fired power plants. Clearly there
must be people in the Obama administration who understand that. Yet
Cap&Trade is still talked about as if it were something good. One wonders:
do they really believe we have "a planet in peril"?
In my
testimony I noted that a "Cap" raises the price of energy, just as
does a simple honest carbon tax on oil, gas and coal at the first sale at the
mine or port of entry. "Cap" is a pseudonym, disguising the fact that
it is a tax, assuming that the public is a bunch of dummies, who will never
catch on. With all its hooks and eyes, Cap&Trade will allow a lot of funny
business. At least we would get a few Wall Street millionaires back in business,
via speculation and gaming the Cap&Trade system (funded by John Q. Public,
of course).
On the train I read
on politico.com that the number of lobbyists in DC working to influence federal
policy on climate change increased in the past few years by 300% to 2,340
lobbyists -- four climate lobbyists for every member of Congress. At least the
alligator shoe business is doing well. Not too good for alligators,
though."
New cap-and-trade
climate legislation offers Wall Street a new opportunity to make money
Banks like Goldman
Sachs and Credit Suisse have formed New York climate desks ahead of U.S.
regulations, in part because the country could be a big buyer of global credits
if world carbon markets eventually link up.
H.R. 2454, the
American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES)
On May 15,2009 U.S. Reps.
Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Edward Markey (D-Mass.) introduced H.R. 2454, the
American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, in the House of
Representatives.H.R. 2454 contains provisions that would amend the Clean Air Act
to establish a cap-and-trade system designed to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas
emissions 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 83% below 2005 levels by 2050. The
market-based approach would establish an absolute cap on the emissions and would
allow trading of emissions permits (“allowances”). The bill achieves its
broad coverage through an upstream compliance mandate on petroleum and most
fluorinated gas producers and importers, and a downstream mandate on electric
generators, industrial sources, and natural gas local distribution companies (LDCs).
The bill allocates a substantial percentage of the allowances for the benefit of
energy consumers and low-income households. As the program proceeds through the
mid-2020s it shifts to more government auctioning with most of the proceeds
returned to households.
The bill’s allocation scheme
includes free allowance allocations to energy-intensive, trade-exposed
industries, merchant coal-fired electric generators, and petroleum refiners. An
important cost control mechanism in the cap-and-trade program is the
availability of domestic and international offsets. The bill contains energy
efficiency provisions that cover grants, standards, rebates and other programs
for buildings, lighting and commercial equipment, water-using equipment, wood
stoves, industrial equipment, and healthcare facilities.
H.R. 2454 contains several
provisions related to vehicles and fuels, including incentives to produce
plug-in vehicles and other advanced technology vehicles. Three percent of
allowances from the greenhouse gas cap-and-trade program would be allocated to
the automotive sector to provide grants to refit or establish plants to build
plug-ins and other advanced vehicles. The bill would also establish a “cash-for-clunkers”
program, providing new vehicle purchasers and lessees with vouchers worth up to
$4,500 for a new, more efficient vehicle to replace an older, less efficient
vehicle, and directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish
greenhouse gas emissions standards for various transportation sectors.
The bill requires EPA to develop
a unified national strategy for addressing the key legal and regulatory barriers
to deployment of commercial scale carbon capture and sequestration.
The legislation would amend
the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) to create an
integrated energy efficiency and renewable electricity standard starting in
2011, requiring retail electricity suppliers to meet 20% of their electricity
demand through renewable energy sources and energy efficiency by 2020.
The bill provides for smart grid
technologies, including products that can be equipped with smart grid
capability, requirements for electric power retailers to reduce their peak loads
using smart grid and other energy efficient technologies, and requirements that
power suppliers ensure that utility smart grid systems will be compatible with
plug-in electric drive vehicles.
Starting in 2012, ACES phases in
a cap on greenhouse gas emissions by large emitters. power plants, refineries,
and large factories.
ACES would cut emissions
17% below 2005 levels in 2020
ACES would reduce
emissions by 83% below 2005 levels by 2050.
How the cap works.
Companies covered under the bill will need to have a permit called an
"allowance" to emit greenhouse gases. Every year, the number of
allowances for the covered sectors will shrink. If an individual firm cuts
its emissions more deeply, it can either .bank. its excess allowances or
sell them to other firms allowing companies to find the most cost effective
solutions to reduce their emissions.
H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES Act) Major Provisions-Click
Here
Al Gore
Albert Arnold "Al"
Gore, Jr. (born March 31, 1948) is an American environmental activist who served
as the 45th Vice President of the United States from 1993 to 2001 under
President Bill Clinton. He is an author, businessperson, and former journalist
Earth
in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit was written by Al Gore in 1992, the
book explains the world's ecological predicament and describes a range of
policies to deal with the most pressing problems. It includes a proposed
"Global Marshall Plan" to address current ecological issues.
In 2006, Gore starred in the
documentary film An Inconvenient Truth, which won the Academy Award for
Documentary Feature. Director Davis Guggenheim asked Gore to join him and other
members of the crew on stage, where Gore gave a brief speech, stating: "My
fellow Americans, people all over the world, we need to solve the climate
crisis. It's not a political issue; it's a moral issue. We have everything we
need to get started, with the possible exception of the will to act. That's a
renewable resource. Let's renew it." He also wrote the book An Inconvenient
Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It,
which won a Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album in February, 2009.
In 2007, Gore was awarded the
Nobel Peace Prize, which was shared by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, headed by Rajendra K. Pachauri (Delhi, India). The award was given
"for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about
man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are
needed to counteract such change."Gore and Pachauri accepted the Nobel
Peace Prize in Oslo, Norway on December 10, 2007. He also helped to organize the
Live Earth benefit concerts.
Al Gore is the chairman of
Generation Investment Management a private equity fund that has taken a 9.5
percent stake in a company that has one of the largest carbon credit portfolios
in the world. He is also a partner in the venture capital firm, Kleiner Perkins
Caufield & Byers, heading that firm's climate change solutions group.
The Alliance for Climate
Protection is an organization founded in the United States in 2006 aiming to
"persuade people of the importance, urgency and feasibility of adopting and
implementing effective and comprehensive solutions for the climate crisis".
The founder and current chairman of the alliance is former US Vice President Al
Gore. They have changed the main focus from from "we can solve it " to "Repower
America".
In
March 2008 the Alliance launched a three-year, $300 million campaign aimed at
mobilizing Americans to push for aggressive reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions. This campaign is one of the most ambitious and costly public advocacy
campaigns in U.S. history.
Cathy Zoi was the founding chief executive officer of the Alliance
for Climate Protection. Cathy Zoi has been confirmed by the U.S. Senate for the
post of Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy at the
Department of Energy (DOE).
Assistant Secretary
for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy In her role as Assistant Secretary,
Ms. Zoi manages the U.S. Department of Energy's $2.1 billion applied science,
research, development, and deployment portfolio, which promotes marketplace
integration of renewable and environmentally sound energy technologies.
Additionally, Ms. Zoi oversees EERE's $16.8 billion in funding under the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
What
did Al Gore accomplish to solve the "climate crisis" as Vice President of the
United States? Not very much ,he championed the Kyoto Protocol but that is about
it. In fact Greenhouse emissions grew significantly while he was Vice President
and Bill Clinton was President..
The William J. Clinton Foundation
launched the Clinton Climate Initiative (CCI) to create and advance solutions to
the core issues driving climate change. From their website-"We take a
holistic approach, addressing the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions and
the people, policies, and practices that impact them."
The charts below show the
increase of green house gases from 1990 to 2007.
U.S. Greenhouse
Gas Emissions by Gas
Annual Percent
Change in U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Cumulative Change
in Annual U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Relative to 1990
Source: EPA 2009 U.S. Greenhouse
Gas Inventory Report
Since Al Gore launched his global
warming crusade, his net worth has increased 5,000 percent to more than $100
million, according to Investors Business Daily.
Commentators and think-tank
policy analysts have suggested that Al Gore has created a conflict of interest
by working with GIM and simultaneously being the spokesperson for action on
global warming. The Competitive Enterprise Institute believes that the
government policies Gore advocated to the U.S. Senate in January 2009 "will
make him and his friends extremely wealthy at the expense of consumers."
The increased costs imposed by a
cap-and-trade program would be passed down by companies to their consumers in
the form of higher prices on energy products.
The estimates by people
supporting Cap and Trade are that the average family will pay an extra $350.00 a
year for increased costs associated with this program. The opponents estimate
the amount to be over $3000.00.
Many companies and individuals
will get very rich with cap and trade.
Everything in the United States
will cost more to the end user -the consumer. And the effect on global
warming and climate
change will be minimal if at all.
Data
compiled from The British Antarctic Study, NASA, Environment Canada,
UNEP, EPA and other sources as stated and credited Researched
by Charles Welch-Updated dailyThis Website is a project of the The
Ozone Hole Inc. a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Organization